Unlock AI power-ups — upgrade and save 20%!
Use code STUBE20OFF during your first month after signup. Upgrade now →
By Jason Schroeder
Published Loading...
N/A views
N/A likes
Get instant insights and key takeaways from this YouTube video by Jason Schroeder.
Macrolevel TAC Planning Fundamentals
📌 The macrolevel TAC plan serves as the strategic plan and constitutes the contractual promise, derived from the slowest reasonable speed plus risk analysis.
🗓️ The macro plan typically uses a five-day TAC time as a standard reference, aligning work within weekly intervals common in the industry.
🔗 It structures work using programs, milestones, phases, zones, TAC time, trains, and trade flow to create a high-level overview of project duration and budget confirmation.
Zone Identification and Work Density
📐 Zones should be leveled by work density, not by area, using tools like work density analysis based on architectural drawings (e.g., grid mapping).
🧩 The process involves identifying observable constraints (physical limitations) first, then mapping work density scores across defined grid blocks to determine size.
🔄 The goal is to adjust zone boundaries until their calculated work densities are close (ideally within ) to ensure balanced flow.
From Macro Guess to Data-Driven Promise
🔢 The initial zone count in the macro plan is a guess; this guess is then tested using the macro calculator with fixed parameters (5-day TAC time and guessed zones).
📊 The calculator determines viable zone counts based on achieving 35% to 50% realized flow potential, adjusting the initial guess to a data-backed promise regarding the number of TAC wagons (work packages) needed.
📈 This refined macro plan (the promise) is distinct from the norm level plan (the tactical target), which incorporates buffers for optimized, faster execution.
Key Points & Insights
➡️ The macrolevel TAC plan is essential for establishing overall duration, confirming the budget, and onboarding builders to the single-page strategic plan.
➡️ Buffers are always required in a production plan; the assignment targets including 5% to 20% buffers within the sequenced TAC wagons.
➡️ Strategic planning (Macro) differs from tactical execution (Norm); the macro is the "art form" focusing on strategy, bottlenecks, and gaining time, while the norm is the "engineering plan" focused on disciplined process execution.
➡️ Using TAC planning avoids the chaos of CPM by incorporating trade flow and buffers, leading to healthier project durations and the ability to finish 1% to 5% earlier than projected.
📸 Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Dec 10, 2025, 02:38 UTC
Find relevant products on Amazon related to this video
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
Full video URL: youtube.com/watch?v=97rABafhyB0
Duration: 1:08:04
Get instant insights and key takeaways from this YouTube video by Jason Schroeder.
Macrolevel TAC Planning Fundamentals
📌 The macrolevel TAC plan serves as the strategic plan and constitutes the contractual promise, derived from the slowest reasonable speed plus risk analysis.
🗓️ The macro plan typically uses a five-day TAC time as a standard reference, aligning work within weekly intervals common in the industry.
🔗 It structures work using programs, milestones, phases, zones, TAC time, trains, and trade flow to create a high-level overview of project duration and budget confirmation.
Zone Identification and Work Density
📐 Zones should be leveled by work density, not by area, using tools like work density analysis based on architectural drawings (e.g., grid mapping).
🧩 The process involves identifying observable constraints (physical limitations) first, then mapping work density scores across defined grid blocks to determine size.
🔄 The goal is to adjust zone boundaries until their calculated work densities are close (ideally within ) to ensure balanced flow.
From Macro Guess to Data-Driven Promise
🔢 The initial zone count in the macro plan is a guess; this guess is then tested using the macro calculator with fixed parameters (5-day TAC time and guessed zones).
📊 The calculator determines viable zone counts based on achieving 35% to 50% realized flow potential, adjusting the initial guess to a data-backed promise regarding the number of TAC wagons (work packages) needed.
📈 This refined macro plan (the promise) is distinct from the norm level plan (the tactical target), which incorporates buffers for optimized, faster execution.
Key Points & Insights
➡️ The macrolevel TAC plan is essential for establishing overall duration, confirming the budget, and onboarding builders to the single-page strategic plan.
➡️ Buffers are always required in a production plan; the assignment targets including 5% to 20% buffers within the sequenced TAC wagons.
➡️ Strategic planning (Macro) differs from tactical execution (Norm); the macro is the "art form" focusing on strategy, bottlenecks, and gaining time, while the norm is the "engineering plan" focused on disciplined process execution.
➡️ Using TAC planning avoids the chaos of CPM by incorporating trade flow and buffers, leading to healthier project durations and the ability to finish 1% to 5% earlier than projected.
📸 Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Dec 10, 2025, 02:38 UTC
Find relevant products on Amazon related to this video
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases

Summarize youtube video with AI directly from any YouTube video page. Save Time.
Install our free Chrome extension. Get expert level summaries with one click.