The Case Study: Kanye West and The Legendary KO Song
📌 The lecture centers on tracing the 100-year history behind the powerful Katrina protest song, "George Bush doesn't care about black people."
🎤 The song, created rapidly by hip-hop duo The Legendary KO, sampled Kanye West’s hit "Gold Digger," which itself sampled Ray Charles’s "I Got a Woman."
🗣️ Kanye West uttered the phrase during a televised Hurricane Katrina relief telethon on September 2, 2005, criticizing the media's portrayal of Black victims versus White victims.

Musical Lineage and Transformation
🎵 Ray Charles’s 1955 song, "I Got a Woman," is credited with birthing soul music by fusing rhythm and blues and gospel, shocking some by substituting the worship of the divine with the worship of a woman.
⛪ "I Got a Woman" is traced back to the hymn "Jesus is All the World to Me" (1904) by W.L. Thompson, and more closely, to the 1953 gospel song "I’ve Got a Savior" by the Clara Ward Singers.
🔄 The message transformation is significant: the exalted savior becomes an amorous lover (Charles), then a grasping gold digger (West), and finally, a political critique (Legendary KO).

Copyright Law and Creativity
⚖️ Under older copyright law (pre-1970s), a 28-year term plus a possible 14-year renewal meant Charles’s 1955 work would have entered the public domain around 1987, allowing free use by later creators.
📈 Current copyright terms (Life + 70 or 95 years) deny subsequent artists the freedoms Ray Charles utilized, forcing Kanye West to secure two separate licenses (sampling and composition) for "Gold Digger."
🎷 Applying modern licensing norms to genres like jazz—which rely heavily on sampling foundational elements—would effectively destroy the art form by requiring licenses for every borrowed lick or progression.
🚫 The Bridgeport ruling suggests that even a two-second digital sample is likely copyright infringement, effectively leading to a "get a license, or do not sample" environment for recorded works.

Fair Use and Cultural Impact
🤔 In music cases, courts are highly reluctant to apply the idea/expression distinction, viewing music as almost entirely expression, making the fair use defense atrophy as markets develop for even "ludicrous" micro-uses.
📢 The primary fair use defense asserted in music copyright cases over the last 40-50 years has been parody; however, The Legendary KO’s song uses West’s work to critique the government, not the song itself.
🚫 Despite its immediate creation and political urgency, The Legendary KO’s song never appeared on commercial TV or radio due to copyright law acting as a one-way filter, impoverishing the national conversation surrounding Hurricane Katrina.

Key Points & Insights
➡️ Music creation, especially genres like soul and hip-hop, relies on large-scale copying and transformation of prior copyrighted material.
➡️ Extended copyright terms (now Life + 70/95 years) restrict the common space of music making needed for new genres to emerge, unlike the older, shorter 28/56-year systems.
➡️ Technology enables massive, tech-enabled infringement, but market feedback loops (important for commercial artists like Ray Charles) are stifled when the legal system prevents mass dissemination via traditional commercial channels.
➡️ The Legendary KO and their collaborators expressed that an "anything-goes" world, where they could borrow freely but risk others altering their own work's message, is preferable for cultural evolution over a highly restrictive licensing world.

📸 Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Nov 24, 2025, 22:58 UTC