There Is Something Faster Than Light
By Veritasium
Published Loading...
N/A views
N/A likes
AI Summary of "There Is Something Faster Than Light"
Get instant insights and key takeaways from this YouTube video by Veritasium.
Einstein's Challenge to Quantum Mechanics and Locality
📌 In 1935, Einstein's thought experiment suggested quantum mechanics violates the sacred principle that nothing travels faster than the speed of light, leading physicists to initially dismiss him.
🔗 Einstein's earlier work showed that assuming instantaneous gravity (as in Newton's theory) leads to paradoxes where cause and effect are reversed for observers moving at different speeds.
🌌 Einstein's General Relativity fixed this by postulating that gravity is mediated by spacetime ripples, spreading at the speed of light, making physics local.
The EPR Paradox and Non-Locality
⚛️ The EPR paper (1935) demonstrated that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics requires instantaneous influence (non-locality) when a particle's wave function collapses upon measurement, regardless of distance.
✉️ In the EPR thought experiment involving entangled particles (electron and positron), measuring one particle's spin instantly determines the other's, implying faster-than-light information transfer to collapse the distant particle's wave function.
💡 Einstein proposed that this non-locality meant quantum mechanics was incomplete and should be replaced by a local hidden variable theory.
🗣️ The initial scientific reaction, heavily influenced by Niels Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation, largely rejected Einstein's challenge, often misrepresenting his arguments.
Bell's Theorem and Experimental Verification
🔬 John Bell revisited the Einstein-Bohr debate in 1963, finding that local hidden variable theories and quantum mechanics made different numerical predictions for certain measurements of entangled particles.
🔢 Bell's theorem showed that local hidden variables predict a minimum disagreement rate of 33% between measurement outcomes when axes differ, while quantum mechanics predicts 25%.
✅ Experiments, like those performed by Alain Aspect, consistently validated the 25% disagreement rate, confirming the predictions of non-local quantum mechanics and ruling out local hidden variable theories.
❓ Bell's proof established that any theory accurately describing this phenomenon must violate either locality or realism (though the video argues it forces the conclusion that locality must be wrong).
Quantum Mechanics Interpretations and Reconciliation
⏳ Despite Bell's proof, quantum mechanics (QM) remains in tension with relativity's locality principle; however, random outcomes in QM prevent faster-than-light signaling, thus avoiding catastrophic relativistic paradoxes.
🌠 The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) offers an alternative by eliminating wave function collapse, suggesting all outcomes occur in parallel universes, thereby recovering locality and satisfying Einstein’s speed limit, though accepting infinite parallel realities.
🏆 Einstein's refusal to "shut up and calculate" was crucial, as his probing led to the discovery of fundamental QM aspects like entanglement and non-locality.
Key Points & Insights
➡️ Einstein's work highlighted that instantaneous action (non-locality) causes paradoxes in physics, which General Relativity resolved by enforcing locality.
➡️ The EPR argument proved the Copenhagen interpretation implies non-local collapse, leading Einstein to seek a local hidden variable theory.
➡️ Bell's theorem provided a way to experimentally distinguish between local and non-local descriptions, with experimental results strongly favoring non-local quantum mechanics.
➡️ The Many-Worlds Interpretation resolves the non-locality/relativity conflict by eliminating collapse, suggesting quantum reality is local regarding causal influence, despite shared entangled states across distance.
📸 Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Dec 27, 2025, 13:21 UTC
Related Products
Find relevant products on Amazon related to this video
Physics
Shop on Amazon
Experiment
Shop on Amazon
Neuroscience Book
Shop on Amazon
Brain Model
Shop on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
📜Transcript
Loading transcript...
📄Video Description
TranslateUpgrade
How an argument between Einstein and Bohr changed quantum mechanics forever.
Sponsored by NordVPN - 🌏 Get exclusive NordVPN deal here: https://NordVPN.com/veritasium It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!✌
▀▀▀
Thank you to Dr Adam Becker for his help with this video - check out his book here https://ve42.co/WhatReal
And special thanks to Thierry Avignon, Benjamin Vest, and Lionel Jacubowiez of the Institut d'Optique Graduate School - Laboratoire d'Enseignement Expérimental (LEnsE)
Correction:
30:53 Electrons and Positrons not Protons
▀▀▀
0:00 The Speed of Gravity
3:07 Spooky Action at a Distance
5:21 The Copenhagen Interpretation
9:12 The EPR Paradox and Hidden Variables
17:25 Einstein vs Bohr
20:51 John Bell and Entanglement
22:14 Bell’s Theorem
29:30 The Bell Inequality Test
33:41 The Most Misunderstood Experiment in Physics
35:06 The Locality Problem
40:37 The Many-Worlds Interpretation
▀▀▀
References:
Adam Becker (2018). What is Real?. Basic Civitas Books - ve42.co/WhatReal
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox via Wikipedia - ve42.co/EPRWiki
Einstein, A. et al. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?. American Physical Society (APS) - ve42.co/EPR
Solvay Conference via Wikipedia - ve42.co/SolvayConf
Owen Willans Richardson Photo Galley via nobelprize.org - ve42.co/SolvayPhoto
Bohr-Einstein debates via Wikipedia - ve42.co/BohrEinDeb
Bacciagaluppi, G and Valentini, A (2009). Quantum Theory at the Crossroads. Cambridge University Press - ve42.co/Crossroads
Bohr, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?. American Physical Society (APS) - ve42.co/BohrResp
The Solvay Conference via rarehistoricalphotos.com - ve42.co/SolvayImg
Kragh, H. (2022). Chemists Without Knowing It?. Firenze University Press - ve42.co/BhorsConferenceImg
Einstein Attacks Quantum Theory. The New York Times via nytimes.com - ve42.co/EinsteinAttackQT
Oral History Interviews via repository.aip.org - ve42.co/BohrInterview
Images & Video:
Image and video references can be found here - https://ve42.co/BellsImRefs
▀▀▀
Special thanks to our Patreon supporters:
Adam Foreman, Albert Wenger, Alex Porter, Alexander Tamas, Anton Ragin, armedtoe, Balkrishna Heroor, Bertrand Serlet, Blake Byers, Bruce, Damien, Dave Kircher, David Johnston, David Tseng, EJ Alexandra, Evgeny Skvortsov, Garrett Mueller, Gnare, gpoly, Hayden Christensen, Ibby Hadeed, Jeromy Johnson, Jon Jamison, Juan Benet, KeyWestr, Kyi, Lee Redden, Marinus Kuivenhoven, Matthias Wrobel, Meekay, meg noah, Michael Bush, Michael Krugman, Orlando Bassotto, Paul Peijzel, Richard Sundvall, Robert Oliveira, Sam Lutfi, Tj Steyn, Ubiquity Ventures, wolfee
▀▀▀
Writers: Mithuna Yoganathan, Casper Mebius & Derek Muller
Producer & Director: Mithuna Yoganathan
Editor: Spencer Wright
Camera Operators: Mithuna Yoganathan, Derek Muller and Maxime Beauquesne
Animators: Alex Drakoulis, Fabio Albertelli, Emma Wright, Andrew Neet and Peter Nelson
Illustrators: Jakub Misiek, Katheryn Chan, Grace Nemanic, Isaac McCree and Natalky Zhuk
Assistant Editor: James Stuart
Researchers: Gabe Strong and Sophia Long
Thumbnail Designers: Abdallah Rabah, Ren Hurley & Ben Powell
Production Team: Katy Southwood, Josh Pitt, Anna Milkovic and Matthew Cavanagh
Executive Producers: Derek Muller & Casper Mebius
Additional video/photos supplied by Getty Images, Storyblocks
Music from Epidemic Sound
Notes
*When we show the Stern Gerlach experiment we’ve chosen to flip the polarity of the machine when measuring a positron. This is because both its spin and charge should oppose the electron’s. This would mean both would bend in the same direction! We’re interested in seeing the difference in the spins so we flip the machine to make this clearer.
**We show curved spacetime using Flamm’s Parabaloid, which we discovered is controversial, more notes on that here - https://ve42.co/HBDFlamm
Full video URL: youtube.com/watch?v=NIk_0AW5hFU
Duration: 44:06
Recently Summarized Videos
💎Related Tags
veritasiumsciencephysicsVeritasiummathsquantum mechanicsquantumquantum entanglementactionaction at a distancespooky action at a distancebell's theorem veritasiumbell's inequality theorem explainedmany worldsmany worlds theorymultiversefree willfaster than lightspeed of lightlightgravityrelativitygeneral relativitytheoretical physicsquantum entanglement explainedspooky actionwhat is quantum entanglementmany worlds interpretationparadox
Total Video Summary Page Visits :3
AI Summary of "There Is Something Faster Than Light"
Get instant insights and key takeaways from this YouTube video by Veritasium.
Einstein's Challenge to Quantum Mechanics and Locality
📌 In 1935, Einstein's thought experiment suggested quantum mechanics violates the sacred principle that nothing travels faster than the speed of light, leading physicists to initially dismiss him.
🔗 Einstein's earlier work showed that assuming instantaneous gravity (as in Newton's theory) leads to paradoxes where cause and effect are reversed for observers moving at different speeds.
🌌 Einstein's General Relativity fixed this by postulating that gravity is mediated by spacetime ripples, spreading at the speed of light, making physics local.
The EPR Paradox and Non-Locality
⚛️ The EPR paper (1935) demonstrated that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics requires instantaneous influence (non-locality) when a particle's wave function collapses upon measurement, regardless of distance.
✉️ In the EPR thought experiment involving entangled particles (electron and positron), measuring one particle's spin instantly determines the other's, implying faster-than-light information transfer to collapse the distant particle's wave function.
💡 Einstein proposed that this non-locality meant quantum mechanics was incomplete and should be replaced by a local hidden variable theory.
🗣️ The initial scientific reaction, heavily influenced by Niels Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation, largely rejected Einstein's challenge, often misrepresenting his arguments.
Bell's Theorem and Experimental Verification
🔬 John Bell revisited the Einstein-Bohr debate in 1963, finding that local hidden variable theories and quantum mechanics made different numerical predictions for certain measurements of entangled particles.
🔢 Bell's theorem showed that local hidden variables predict a minimum disagreement rate of 33% between measurement outcomes when axes differ, while quantum mechanics predicts 25%.
✅ Experiments, like those performed by Alain Aspect, consistently validated the 25% disagreement rate, confirming the predictions of non-local quantum mechanics and ruling out local hidden variable theories.
❓ Bell's proof established that any theory accurately describing this phenomenon must violate either locality or realism (though the video argues it forces the conclusion that locality must be wrong).
Quantum Mechanics Interpretations and Reconciliation
⏳ Despite Bell's proof, quantum mechanics (QM) remains in tension with relativity's locality principle; however, random outcomes in QM prevent faster-than-light signaling, thus avoiding catastrophic relativistic paradoxes.
🌠 The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) offers an alternative by eliminating wave function collapse, suggesting all outcomes occur in parallel universes, thereby recovering locality and satisfying Einstein’s speed limit, though accepting infinite parallel realities.
🏆 Einstein's refusal to "shut up and calculate" was crucial, as his probing led to the discovery of fundamental QM aspects like entanglement and non-locality.
Key Points & Insights
➡️ Einstein's work highlighted that instantaneous action (non-locality) causes paradoxes in physics, which General Relativity resolved by enforcing locality.
➡️ The EPR argument proved the Copenhagen interpretation implies non-local collapse, leading Einstein to seek a local hidden variable theory.
➡️ Bell's theorem provided a way to experimentally distinguish between local and non-local descriptions, with experimental results strongly favoring non-local quantum mechanics.
➡️ The Many-Worlds Interpretation resolves the non-locality/relativity conflict by eliminating collapse, suggesting quantum reality is local regarding causal influence, despite shared entangled states across distance.
📸 Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Dec 27, 2025, 13:21 UTC
Related Products
Find relevant products on Amazon related to this video
Physics
Shop on Amazon
Experiment
Shop on Amazon
Neuroscience Book
Shop on Amazon
Brain Model
Shop on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
Loading Similar Videos...
Recently Summarized Videos
Get the Chrome Extension
Summarize youtube video with AI directly from any YouTube video page. Save Time.
Install our free Chrome extension. Get expert level summaries with one click.