Unlock AI power-ups ā upgrade and save 20%!
Use code STUBE20OFF during your first month after signup. Upgrade now ā
By Cintamobil TV
Published Loading...
N/A views
N/A likes
Get instant insights and key takeaways from this YouTube video by Cintamobil TV.
Fuel Efficiency Test (80 km Route)
š The fuel efficiency test covered approximately 78ā80 km on a mixed route (mostly highway/toll roads).
ā½ Suzuki XL7 achieved the best efficiency at 18.7 km/L (or 4.17 liters consumed).
š Toyota Avanza (or similar) came in second, achieving 18.5 km/L (4.29 liters consumed).
āļø Honda BR-V performed the lowest at approximately 18.3 km/L (4.37 liters consumed), despite featuring modern CVT and Auto Start-Stop technology.
Hill Climb Performance (500 kg Load)
ā°ļø The vehicles were tested climbing a steep slope with an added load exceeding 500 kg (including passengers and parts).
š¢ Honda BR-V successfully managed the climb, attributing its performance to a large engine and effective CVT.
š Mitsubishi Xpander Cross struggled initially but managed to complete the climb, noting some wheel spin and needing more effort.
šµ Suzuki XL7 performed strongly, demonstrating excellent power delivery without significant strain or delay, suggesting efficient gearing for the climb.
Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH) Test
š The interior noise level was measured with the AC set to level 1 for all passengers.
š Mitsubishi Xpander Cross was the loudest at 77.5 dB.
š Suzuki XL7 measured 68.4 dB, making it quieter than the Xpander.
𤫠Honda BR-V recorded the lowest noise level at 59.0 dB, suggesting superior cabin insulation despite some reports of a harsher ride quality.
Cabin Space and Comfort Assessment
𦵠The second-row legroom was tested with occupants averaging 177 cm to 180 cm in height.
š The Honda BR-V felt the most cramped in the third row, with knees touching the seat in front, confirming that newer models feel smaller internally.
āļø The Suzuki XL7 offered the most flexible third-row space, allowing passengers to sit relatively comfortably when the second row was adjusted forward moderately.
šŖ The Mitsubishi Xpander Cross offered decent legroom but was ranked behind the XL7 in overall comfort for the third row by the reviewers.
Features and Pricing Comparison (Top Variants)
ā The Honda BR-V Prestige (IDR 342.9 million) was highlighted for its extensive safety suite, including Honda Sensing (Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Keep Assist), and superior interior quality (synthetic/real leather mix).
š The Suzuki XL7 Alpha (IDR 273.15 million) was praised for unique family-oriented features like a rear-view mirror camera display (like Alphard) and a ventilated cup holder/cooler.
š° The Mitsubishi Xpander Cross (IDR 320.5 million) was considered potentially overpriced compared to the feature set, although its suspension was deemed the most comfortable.
Key Points & Insights
ā”ļø For fuel efficiency, the Suzuki XL7 surprisingly outperformed newer CVT rivals like the BR-V, achieving 18.7 km/L.
ā”ļø The Honda BR-V offers the best safety features (Honda Sensing) and the quietest cabin (59.0 dB), but its high price point (IDR 342.9M) and tighter cabin space are major drawbacks.
ā”ļø The XL7 provides strong all-around performance, excelling in the hill climb test and offering practical, unique features like a cooler box and excellent cargo visibility.
ā”ļø When testing third-row comfort, the Suzuki XL7 appeared to offer superior legroom compared to the newly designed Honda BR-V.
šø Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Nov 26, 2025, 06:26 UTC
Find relevant products on Amazon related to this video
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
Full video URL: youtube.com/watch?v=AH4V4O5-PxA
Duration: 30:44
Get instant insights and key takeaways from this YouTube video by Cintamobil TV.
Fuel Efficiency Test (80 km Route)
š The fuel efficiency test covered approximately 78ā80 km on a mixed route (mostly highway/toll roads).
ā½ Suzuki XL7 achieved the best efficiency at 18.7 km/L (or 4.17 liters consumed).
š Toyota Avanza (or similar) came in second, achieving 18.5 km/L (4.29 liters consumed).
āļø Honda BR-V performed the lowest at approximately 18.3 km/L (4.37 liters consumed), despite featuring modern CVT and Auto Start-Stop technology.
Hill Climb Performance (500 kg Load)
ā°ļø The vehicles were tested climbing a steep slope with an added load exceeding 500 kg (including passengers and parts).
š¢ Honda BR-V successfully managed the climb, attributing its performance to a large engine and effective CVT.
š Mitsubishi Xpander Cross struggled initially but managed to complete the climb, noting some wheel spin and needing more effort.
šµ Suzuki XL7 performed strongly, demonstrating excellent power delivery without significant strain or delay, suggesting efficient gearing for the climb.
Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH) Test
š The interior noise level was measured with the AC set to level 1 for all passengers.
š Mitsubishi Xpander Cross was the loudest at 77.5 dB.
š Suzuki XL7 measured 68.4 dB, making it quieter than the Xpander.
𤫠Honda BR-V recorded the lowest noise level at 59.0 dB, suggesting superior cabin insulation despite some reports of a harsher ride quality.
Cabin Space and Comfort Assessment
𦵠The second-row legroom was tested with occupants averaging 177 cm to 180 cm in height.
š The Honda BR-V felt the most cramped in the third row, with knees touching the seat in front, confirming that newer models feel smaller internally.
āļø The Suzuki XL7 offered the most flexible third-row space, allowing passengers to sit relatively comfortably when the second row was adjusted forward moderately.
šŖ The Mitsubishi Xpander Cross offered decent legroom but was ranked behind the XL7 in overall comfort for the third row by the reviewers.
Features and Pricing Comparison (Top Variants)
ā The Honda BR-V Prestige (IDR 342.9 million) was highlighted for its extensive safety suite, including Honda Sensing (Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Keep Assist), and superior interior quality (synthetic/real leather mix).
š The Suzuki XL7 Alpha (IDR 273.15 million) was praised for unique family-oriented features like a rear-view mirror camera display (like Alphard) and a ventilated cup holder/cooler.
š° The Mitsubishi Xpander Cross (IDR 320.5 million) was considered potentially overpriced compared to the feature set, although its suspension was deemed the most comfortable.
Key Points & Insights
ā”ļø For fuel efficiency, the Suzuki XL7 surprisingly outperformed newer CVT rivals like the BR-V, achieving 18.7 km/L.
ā”ļø The Honda BR-V offers the best safety features (Honda Sensing) and the quietest cabin (59.0 dB), but its high price point (IDR 342.9M) and tighter cabin space are major drawbacks.
ā”ļø The XL7 provides strong all-around performance, excelling in the hill climb test and offering practical, unique features like a cooler box and excellent cargo visibility.
ā”ļø When testing third-row comfort, the Suzuki XL7 appeared to offer superior legroom compared to the newly designed Honda BR-V.
šø Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Nov 26, 2025, 06:26 UTC
Find relevant products on Amazon related to this video
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases

Summarize youtube video with AI directly from any YouTube video page. Save Time.
Install our free Chrome extension. Get expert level summaries with one click.