Political Controversy and Legal Threats
📌 Junimar Girsang, a PDIP politician, intended to report Rocky Gerung despite Gerung clarifying his criticism targeted Jokowi as President, not as a PDIP cadre.
🏛️ Girsang insisted on the report because he believes Rocky Gerung insulted the state symbol ("simbol negara").
❓ Rocky Gerung expressed confusion, questioning since when the President is considered a state symbol, noting the President is a cadre of the PDIP.

Rocky Gerung's Stance on Criticism and Clarification
🗣️ Rocky Gerung affirmed he was serious in his accusation that the President does not understand Pancasila and stated he will not provide a clarification ("klarifikasi").
🤨 Tedy Gusnaidi (PKPI expert council member) felt insulted by the statement that the President doesn't understand Pancasila, demanding clarification due to the seriousness of the accusation.

Legal and Constitutional Context
📜 Irman Putra Sidin clarified that the President is not a state symbol according to the law; state symbols are strictly defined as the flag, language, and emblem ("Bendera, bahasa dan lambang negara").
🧑‍⚖️ Members of Parliament (like Girsang) are granted immunity to speak in and out of parliament, meaning their statements, even if disagreeable, must be heard.

Key Points & Insights
➡️ The central dispute hinges on whether criticizing the President's understanding of Pancasila constitutes insulting a state symbol, a claim constitutionally contested.
➡️ Rocky Gerung maintained his critical statement was serious and final, refusing subsequent demands for clarification or retraction.
➡️ Legally, Indonesian state symbols are explicitly defined as the flag, language, and emblem, not the office or person of the President.

📸 Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Oct 07, 2025, 05:25 UTC