Unlock AI power-ups โ upgrade and save 20%!
Use code STUBE20OFF during your first month after signup. Upgrade now โ
By Kiran Academy - Java By Kiran
Published Loading...
N/A views
N/A likes
Get instant insights and key takeaways from this YouTube video by Kiran Academy - Java By Kiran.
Manual Testing vs. Automation Testing Differences
๐ Manual testing involves human interaction without automation tools, while automation testing uses tools like Selenium or QTP to execute tests based on recorded or programmed expected results.
โฑ๏ธ Manual testing is slower and time-consuming as it requires human resources, whereas automation testing is significantly faster once scripts are ready for execution.
๐ฐ Initial investment for manual testing is low, but automation testing has a higher initial investment due to tool costs (free or paid).
Comparative Criteria Analysis
๐ Reliability and Accuracy: Manual testing has lower accuracy due to the possibility of human error over long periods (e.g., 10 hours of work), while automation testing is more reliable and accurate.
๐ ๏ธ Frameworks: Manual testing relies on checklists and procedures, while automation requires frameworks like Data-Driven or Keyword-Driven testing.
๐ก Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing, requiring random interaction without predefined test cases, is only possible through manual testing.
When to Choose Which Testing Type
๐ฉโ๐ป Manual Testing Suitability: Best for functional testing, usability testing, exploratory testing, and testing complex scenarios where human judgment and decision-making are crucial.
๐ Automation Testing Suitability: Ideal for regression testing, performance testing, load testing, and executing large volumes of repeated functional test cases efficiently.
โ๏ธ Hybrid Approach: For large-scale projects, it is best practice to use both manual and automation testing, applying manual testing to complex functions and automation to repetitive tasks.
Key Points & Insights
โก๏ธ Automation testing will not completely replace manual testing, as certain tasks requiring human intuition cannot be automated.
โก๏ธ Automation testing is strongly suggested when running repeated test cases frequently (e.g., 50 test cases) to avoid human fatigue and errors.
โก๏ธ For short-term projects or tests run infrequently (only twice), using manual testing is often more practical than investing in automation setup.
๐ธ Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Jan 11, 2026, 09:17 UTC
Find relevant products on Amazon related to this video
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
Full video URL: youtube.com/watch?v=BijB5ZkYGRo
Duration: 14:31
Get instant insights and key takeaways from this YouTube video by Kiran Academy - Java By Kiran.
Manual Testing vs. Automation Testing Differences
๐ Manual testing involves human interaction without automation tools, while automation testing uses tools like Selenium or QTP to execute tests based on recorded or programmed expected results.
โฑ๏ธ Manual testing is slower and time-consuming as it requires human resources, whereas automation testing is significantly faster once scripts are ready for execution.
๐ฐ Initial investment for manual testing is low, but automation testing has a higher initial investment due to tool costs (free or paid).
Comparative Criteria Analysis
๐ Reliability and Accuracy: Manual testing has lower accuracy due to the possibility of human error over long periods (e.g., 10 hours of work), while automation testing is more reliable and accurate.
๐ ๏ธ Frameworks: Manual testing relies on checklists and procedures, while automation requires frameworks like Data-Driven or Keyword-Driven testing.
๐ก Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing, requiring random interaction without predefined test cases, is only possible through manual testing.
When to Choose Which Testing Type
๐ฉโ๐ป Manual Testing Suitability: Best for functional testing, usability testing, exploratory testing, and testing complex scenarios where human judgment and decision-making are crucial.
๐ Automation Testing Suitability: Ideal for regression testing, performance testing, load testing, and executing large volumes of repeated functional test cases efficiently.
โ๏ธ Hybrid Approach: For large-scale projects, it is best practice to use both manual and automation testing, applying manual testing to complex functions and automation to repetitive tasks.
Key Points & Insights
โก๏ธ Automation testing will not completely replace manual testing, as certain tasks requiring human intuition cannot be automated.
โก๏ธ Automation testing is strongly suggested when running repeated test cases frequently (e.g., 50 test cases) to avoid human fatigue and errors.
โก๏ธ For short-term projects or tests run infrequently (only twice), using manual testing is often more practical than investing in automation setup.
๐ธ Video summarized with SummaryTube.com on Jan 11, 2026, 09:17 UTC
Find relevant products on Amazon related to this video
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases

Summarize youtube video with AI directly from any YouTube video page. Save Time.
Install our free Chrome extension. Get expert level summaries with one click.